Home Law & Judiciary Court Fixes Feb 24, 2021 to Hear Whistleblower’s N100m Suit Against ICPC

Court Fixes Feb 24, 2021 to Hear Whistleblower’s N100m Suit Against ICPC


[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]The Federal High Court, Abuja, has fixed February 24, 2021, for hearing in a N100 million suit filed by a whistleblower, George Davidson, against the ICPC.

Justice Nkeonye Maha, who adjourned the matter in her ruling, hinged the decision on the fact that parties in the suit had yet to be joined.

Also joined in the N100 million suit is a civil servant,  Regina Davidson.

Davidson, through his lawyer, A. O. Osawaru, filed a motion on notice dated October 19 for the enforcement of his fundamental rights against his alleged illegal detention by officers of the ICPC.

He was said to have been detained in the commission cell on October 13 without justification until October 24 when he was moved to a police cell at the Federal Secretariat.
He alleged that he was kept in the cell until October 31 when he was released over an information supplied to the anti-corruption agency, through a non-governmental organisation, about Dominic, a grade level 9 federal civil servant.
While the ICPC is the 1st respondent; Akeem Lawal, an ICPC Director of Operations; Offili Innocent, ICPC Investigator;  Maman Kuru, ICPC Investigator; Kontagora Khadijat, ICPC operative; Mrs Regina Dominic and Attorney General of the Federation (AGF) are 2nd to 7th respondents respectively.
Osawaru, in the application, argued that no court had found the applicant guilty of any offence to warrant such detention.
He sought the court’s declaration that the detention of his client by the ICPC and its agents (2nd to 5th respondents), at the behest of Mrs Dominic (6th respondent), was unlawful and unwarranted.
“An order directing the 7th respondent (AGF) to take over and assign the applicant’s petition against the 6th respondent to another anti-corruption agency for a discreet investigation. The sum of a hundred million naira against the 1st to 6th respondents as damages/compensation for the illegal, unwarranted, unlawful and unconstitutional arrest and detention of the applicant.
The lawyer also urged the court to direct the 1st to 5th respondents to refrain from further actions that could amount to the breach of Davidson’s fundamental rights, among others.
Counsel to the applicant informed the court that the motion on notice was for the enforcement of fundamental rights of his client.
When Justice Maha asked whether an issue had been joined, Osawaru responded that “after the close of work on Friday, we got informed that the 1st defendant filed a counter affidavit and preliminary objection which we have not seen till this moment”.
“But if no issues have been joined, you have to take a date,” the judge said.
“Hope he (Davidson) is not on detention” Maha asked.
“Upon hearing that the matter is before your honourable court, they released him” Osawaru responded.
Justice Maha then adjourned the matter until February 24 for consolidated hearing of the substantive motion.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here